20 March 2009

Urban Evangelism?

I read an article in the current issue of Comment magazine about Christian attitudes toward cities, and I was struck by a comment the author, Robert Joustra, made about the nature of urban mission work:
"If our urban activities as people of faith are consistently predicated on conversion, we shall quickly become very bad neighbours. I think of this as a kind of spiritual narcissism which grows out of an interior insecurity about our own faith and life."
He later goes on to suggest that rather than viewing missions work, particularly in our home cities of urban North America, in a truncated sense, with conversion and proselytization as its exclusive goal...
"...we learn to live and share the Gospel story in ways that far exceed a simple dualistic mission--we start to think of worshipping God and honouring him by building efficient transit [etc.]...the Gospel in the urban metropolis calls us forth into all the manifold spheres of city life, to enact justice, sustain and cultivate beauty..."
I think this observation is right on, and I think the practices of even the most adamant, unapologetic, and conservative Christians show that they agree. The most evident example of this that I see is the way in which most overseas missions work, especially when there is a language barrier, is carried out. I've never heard of a team memorizing the Romans road in Spanish or Chinese; but they do have faith that the Spirit of God will be evident in their work of building a home for a single mother, or teaching English to students.

I am not saying that I think preaching the gospel has no place in missions work. Obviously, even in the above example, for instance, the gospel is at the forefront. However, I am indeed suggesting that there are benefits to reexamining urban missions along the lines mentioned. Rather than conversion being our number one goal, what if our goal was to cultivate life-giving practices within an urban context so that the gospel can be embodied through our actions, rather than (often empty) words? And what would happen if we partnered with inter-faith non-profits, government organizations, and all resources at our disposal creatively and faithfully to do it?

I think implicit in Christ's command to go and preach the gospel to all nations is a call to constantly deconstruct the practices we employ to accomplish it. While it may have been appropriate and effective in St. Paul's context to walk into a city, head to the synagogue and start converting people, our own reality is much different.

While there are appropriate times to evangelize and a number of people who respond positively to it, I think one thing that is lacking in our Church culture is a desire to serve with absolutely no ulterior motives including the desire for the one served to come to Christ or attend a church service.

What if we serve selflessly, often, and creatively enough that we become known as lovers rather than preachers, and by the work of the Holy Spirit, our cities invite themselves to a Sunday service? Amidst a culture of death and violence, there is something so compelling about the Church, whose gospel offers life and peace.

10 comments:

  1. Ben, a couple of thoughts…

    First, I’m interested in hearing how you arrived at your position (what’s your biblical point of reference) when you said “I think in Christ’s command to go and preach the gospel to all nations is a call to constantly deconstruct the practices we employ to accomplish it.”

    Second, I’m likewise interested in hearing how you arrived at your position (what’s your biblical point of reference) when you said “While there are appropriate times to evangelize…”

    Thirdly, a critique of urban evangelism is only theoretical until one steps into the urban context to live and minister, and is put into circumstances that might require that our actions match our theory.

    Lastly, if our approach to urban evangelism is to be any different than suburban or rural or foreign evangelism; I’d be interested in hearing how you arrived at your position (what’s your biblical point of reference.)

    ReplyDelete
  2. hey ken! from the onset, i just want to make clear that i haven't arrived at any positions; the purpose of putting these thoughts in a public forum was to have conversations like this to get closer to one. that being said, i'll try to briefly respond to the 4 things you mentioned, out of order:

    3. i totally agree. the impetus for even writing this was the article i mentioned. while the author has made a career out of urban missions and church work, i have not (though i have seen the approach he suggests fruitful while trying to be gospel-oriented in my own interactions and conversations with people). that's where you come in :) for instance, do you find his critique helpful, inaccurate, etc?

    ReplyDelete
  3. 4. i probably was unclear, but i'm not suggesting that any of those be different from one another in spirit (though they obviously are to an extent in practice, by necessity). i'm precisely asking how they should be the same.

    2. when i referred to evangelism, i meant it in the sense of soap box, fire and brimstone, turn or burn, you need to be saved evangelism. as far as a biblical point of reference, i think we can look at Christ's whole ministry and see that he practiced prudence and interacted with different people in different ways according to the context and their personality. while i'm not suggesting we coddle people who are hostile towards the gospel, it seems only right that we present it to them in a way that will help them get past that suspiciousness. most people it seems would be open to a Church-sponsored after school program, and hostile towards someone coming up and telling them they're going to hell if they don't stop having children out of wedlock. a less extreme example would be that an attempt to start a conversation about God is more openly received by a person who from experience has a positive view of the Church. that's why i brought up the question of what has chronological priority: conversion or love. as far as my comment itself, it seems true in our experience that there are times where trying to evangelize to someone (even in a non-soap box way) is inappropriate and ineffective.

    1. again, i'd point to the shape of Christ's ministry and also the story of the early church. before giving the great commission, Christ told his followers to love one another. Jesus fed some, preached to some, argued with some, healed some, all according to their own personal context. similarly, his interactions and conversations with gallileans are different than those with samaritans. in the days of the early church, St. Paul preached and encouraged churches, while St. James enacted Justice in Jerusalem. In our own practice and experience, the practices we use to bring the gospel to people in China is very different than those we might use in West Virginia. that's what i meant by the fact that this seems to be implicit in the command. it doesn't seem to be in tune with the rest of his teaching for Christ to say "here's the plan, these are the bullet points, program these into your head, because you're going to do the same thing everywhere you go so that people will become disciples.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Benjamin- thought provoking as ever. I daresay this idea of serving without agenda is not a popular one in the good ole' USA - we want a 3-step-process culminating into me handing a plate of food to some homeless guy so that we can comeplete our task and feel like "we've served." Getting past the agenda is very hard for us but I think so necessary. Can we love and just..love? Can we "just serve?" Them thar is radical thoughts for many my young friend!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Bare with me on these random conglomeration of thoughts, because i think there is a lot of truth to them but also has potential for people to initially flare their nostrils and cause a rise in blood pressure:

    -When a "Christian's" servitude becomes wrongly intertwined with the modern religious practice of "Evangelism", both entities become completely diluted by the other due to the nature of the, "Servitude=Evangelism=Good Christian" mentality.

    -I think of the Amish often in my thoughts regarding reverence, sacrifice, servitude, & Church unification.

    -Amish simply try to serve the Lord through actions, sacrifice, and a life of Love & Forgiveness towards others.

    -They also take to heart what many Christians take to the Dumpster these days: Separation from the world. TRUE separation. "Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the LORD, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you" (2Corinthians 6:17)

    -If the Church began to practice actual separation, live lives of Peace, Community, Forgiveness, and Love with eachother, THAT is what the God will and commands of his church.

    -Do not confuse the Church body, with certain individuals in the Church. I deduct that it would be exceptionally Biblical to have a chosen few (Elders and Deacons) in the Church are to be the ones sent out to preach the Gospel, EXACTLY how the Bible says.

    -The Entire Church of Corinth did not go out to surrounding cities to further the name of Jesus Christ, a chosen few did. Because quite frankly, 90% of "Christians" have no business going out and talking to others about Christ because they have absolutely no foundational or fruitful Theological knowledge.

    -Pagans, should be preached to by the few, and served to through the example the Church body gives of Love, Forgiveness, Community with one another & Sacrifice in the name a Jesus Christ.

    ReplyDelete
  6. i do think there's a lot to be admired in the lifestlye of the amish. i also think the recent popularity and rise of 'new monasticism' in our generation is evidence that such a lifestlye is very attractive.

    however, i don't think we should privilege it over say, the neo-reformed/calvinist perspective that rather than being called AWAY from culture, we are called INTO all spheres of culture; not in order to inject our political or religious agenda, but to act as a redemptive presence.

    i think both are faithful responses.

    i'd also be careful about privileging doctrinal knowledge. remember Christ told us to be like 'little children.' i would add that a role of elders and deacons within the church is to EQUIP everyone, rather than assume they are too dumb or inexperienced to go outside the walls.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Be very weary of disregarding the very strong and reoccurring theme of Separatism throughout the entirety of the New Covenant.

    I heard a speaker recently spout the exact phrase of, "Be all things, to all people, so that some may come to Christ."- It made me sick to my stomach. Nothing could be more counter intuitive. and un-Biblical.
    Because it feeds directly into the hyper consumerism culture we have in the West, that we need to water down our faith, in order to make Christianity "marketable" to the heathen and give them a bunch of free crap.

    I simply find no evidence in the New Covenant that the entire Church body needs to "go out" and market a form of dull Christianity to the lost.

    Could the "Great Commission" simply mean that we should are to have separate Church bodies throughout the globe who preach the Good News and fulfill God's will of not intermingling with darkness.

    There will be converts if the Church practices separation and the Love, Forgiveness, Sacrifice, and Community i talked about before. Doing the Lord's will is contagious and attractive.

    Just some thoughts and concerns... stirring the pot... its fun this way haha

    ReplyDelete
  8. I've chosen to be involved in community theatre in GR partly because I love the art but also because I see that community as one that has often been neglected by the church. So I guess I have a dual-purpose: feeding my soul and hopefully theirs.

    What I've discovered is that many of my friends(and this may be unique to the area in which we are located) come from religious backgrounds, but they have become tired of being preached at and condemned. One person said once that it bugged them that Christians assumed that they needed to be "saved" (or even desired it) before they even got to know them. And for many, it's not even about rejecting God or Jesus and the salvation he offers; it's a rejection of the Christian lifestyle, which seems to them to be more about hate and intolerance than love and acceptance. They desire to embrace Jesus' message of hope and peace and life and forgiveness, but have not often seen it in practice with those who claim to be his followers.

    ReplyDelete
  9. So I guess as a start at an answer to your question "What if we serve selflessly, often, and creatively enough that we become known as lovers rather than preachers, and by the work of the Holy Spirit, our cities invite themselves to a Sunday service?"...
    1. My experience has been that I've had more and better conversations about faith when I've listened and loved and dialogued...when I've waited until my friend is ready for and open to the discussion...when I've waited for the time when they know that what I'm saying is coming from a place of love for them rather than as a condemnation.

    and

    2.Let's try it and see. I have no idea if this is the right path to take. But I don't think it hurts anyone to be loved. =) And I agree with you that part of us being separate from the world should be that we are the MOST loving, the MOST forgiving, etc.

    My biggest goal in life is that everyone I meet will know how they are loved and accepted, even when at their worst,(and that I won't demand anything in return) and hopefully see that as a reflection of God's love and acceptance of them.

    Thanks for opening this discussion.

    ReplyDelete
  10. thanks for sharing this. i think that the sentiment of the article is right on--we need to show love before we start talking. maybe by just taking the time to serve someone by doing something tangible like helping with home repairs or something less tangible like listening to their thoughts over coffee without judging is key to our witness. i think lots of people are turned off by christians not because of the belief aspect of it all but because they can be so annoying and ignorant in what they/we say and do. Hopefully being a bit more intentional in how we treat others on a daily basis will show sincerity and open up opportunities to share about life/faith/ect but more importantly allow others to ask questions about faith. this article is a great reality check.

    ReplyDelete

Thanks for contributing to the conversation!